Symmetry in R3
**Review**
**The Cyclic
Group**
**Reflection**
**Glide
Reflection**
**Proper
Rotations**
**Polyhedra**
**Sources**
**********************************************************************
Rigid motion of Rn is m: Rn to Rn that preserves distance
Orthogonal group = On = all rigid motions that fix the origin = {A 0 GL(n, R) | AT, A = I }
In other words, the rigid motion can be represented by an orthogonal matrix.
In R2, the members of On are rotations around the origin and reflections about lines through the origin.
The reason the orthogonal group is so important is because all rigid motions are m(X) = AX + b where A 0 On.
For every A in On, det (A) = ± 1
det (A) = 1 then it is orientation-preserving (rotations)
det (A) = -1 then it is orientation-reversing (reflections)
Symmetry of a set F
m:F to F
m(F) = F
Symmetry group of F is a subgroup of M, the group of all rigid motions. The symmetry group is the set of all symmetries of F.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Cn = {e, a, a2, ... , an-1} where an = e.
In R2, Cn represents the group of rotations around point O.
In R3, think of Cn as rotations around an axis through O.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Umklappung is what we call “pancake”
Look at a reflection in R2 around line l.
The same reflection in R 3 is really a rotation around l.
The effect is a pancake rotation.
There are three types of reflections: point reflections, line reflections, and plane reflections. To reflect a point P, continue the line perpendicular to the point, line, or plane that also goes through P. The reflected point, P', occurs on that line when the distance from P to the point/line/plane is the same as the distance from P' to the point/line/plane.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Dn = {e, x, x2, ... , xn-1, y, xy, ... , xn-1y} where xn = e, y2 = e, yx = x-1y.
In R 2, Dn represents the group of reflections and rotations in the plane. (contains rotations of the cyclic group)
In R 3, think of those reflections as pancakes around the old line of reflection. There are n pancakes (one for each old line of reflection).
The new group we’ll call D' n = rotations in R 3.
D1 has only one rotation, which is the identity, and one line of reflection.
Therefore D'1 has only one pancake rotation
D'1 = {e, a} where a2 = e. So D'1 = C2
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Ingredients:
one glide plane
one vector moving parallel to glide plane
Steps:
1. Translate by vector
2. Reflect in glide plane
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Special Orthogonal Group = SOn= {A in On
| det (A) = 1}
In R 3, A in SO3 iff A represents proper rotation of R 3
In other words, proper rotations fix a line through the origin. Proper rotations go around an axis.
All proper rotations in R 3:
Cn (n = 1, 2, 3, ... )
Dn (n = 2, 3, ... )
T =
symmetries of tetrahedron
W =
symmetries of cube/octahedron
P = symmetries of dodecahedron/icosahedron
Proof (from Weyl):
We’ll say we have a group of rotations and then show that it has to be one of those above.
Let G be a group of rotations = {e, g1, g2, ... , gn-1}
|G| = n
We can think of the points on a unit sphere.
Take an arbitrary element g with order v. Then v is bigger than 1 if g is not e.
The rotation g fixes an axis.
There are exactly v rotations (including e) that fix that axis.
Let p be a point on the axis.
Gp = rotations fixing p = {e, a1, a2, ... , an-1} av = e
This is a cyclic group with order v.
Let q be a point not on the axis.
Then g takes q to qi
q ~ q1 ~ q2 ~ ... ~qv-1
“~” means you can get there by g
The equivalence class of q is all places q can end up.
There are n possible g’s (rotations) so n equivalence classes.|
A Useful Thing in Weyl: |Cp| = n/v (see Weyl for proof)
Thus, v divides n and (number of p’s)·v = n
The number of combos (g is not e, p) = 2(n - 1) because there are 2 p’s for each rotation and (n - 1) is the number of rotations possible excluding the identity.
For each p there are (v - 1) rotations that are not the identity
So the number of combos (g is not e, p) =SUM(vp - 1) as we range over p.
Put our two formulae together to get 2(n - 1) =SUM(vp - 1) =SUM(# of p’s)(# of rotations for each) as we range over Cp. Plug in to get
SUM(n/v)(v - 1) as we range over Cp
Divide by n on both sides. Now we have Formula $:
2 - (2/n) = SUM(1 - 1(1/v)) as we range over Cp
If n = 1 then G = {e} = C1
Else n >= 2 (there are at least 2 rotations in G)
Then 2 - (2/n) is at least 1
So we get Formula @:
1 <= 2 - (2/n) < 2
n >= 2 means there are at least 2 Cp’s.
v >= 2 means that 1 - (1/v) >= ½
Use $ and @ to get 2 - (2/n) = SUM(1 - 1(1/v)) < 2
We see that the number of Cp’s must be less than 4.
So the number of Cp’s is either 2 or 3.
Case 1: There are 2 Cp’s
2 - (2/n) = 1 - (1/v1) + 1 - (1/v2)
2 - (2/n) = 2 - ((1/v1)+(1/v2))
2/n = (1/v1) + (1/v2)
2 = (n/v1) + (n/v2)
Since n, v1, v2 are integers, (n/v1) = 1 and (n/v2) = 1
So n = v1 = v2
Size of Cp = (n/v) = 1 (ie there is only one pole in class or |g| = n)
Then G = Cn = {rotations around vertical axis}
Case 2: There are 3 Cp’s
2 - (2/n) = 1 - (1/v1) + 1 - (1/v2) + 1 - (1/v3)
2 - (2/n) = 3 - ((1/v1) + (1/v2) + (1/v3))
-(1 + (2/n) = - ((1/v1) + (1/v2) + (1/v3))
1 + (2/n) = (1/v1) + (1/v2) + (1/v3)
Arrange so that v1 <= v2
<= v3
Suppose v1 > 2
Then at the biggest, (1/v1) + (1/v2) + (1/v3) = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1
So (1/v1) + (1/v2) + (1/v3) = 1 + (2/n) <= 1
Subtract 1 from both sides. We get (2/n) <= 0, which contradicts n being a positive integer.
So v1 = 2.
2 <= v2 <= v3
Then v2 = 2 or 3 because (1/v2) + (1/v3) = ½ + (2/n) so v2 < 4.
Subcase a: v2 = 2
Then 1 + 2/n = ½ + ½ + v3
2/n = v3
n = 2 v3
2 = n/v3 = # of p’s in class Cp = # of places g3 takes p
g3 = pancake so G = D' n
Subcase b: v2 = 3
Then 1 +
2/n = ½ + 1/3 + 1/v3
1/6 + 2/n = 1/v3
Since v2 <= v3, 3 <= v3
If v3= 3, n = 12 and we have G = T
If v3= 4, n = 24 and we have G = W
If v3= 5, n = 60 and we have G = P
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
There are five regular polyhedra in space: tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron.
Symmetries of polyhedra are not cyclic or dihedral. The Platonic solids have rotations around axes and reflections about planes.
Rotations of Tetrahedron:
There are three axes of rotation for rotations by P (one for each pair of opposite edges)
There are four axes of rotation for rotations by P /3 (one for each face and its opposite vertex)
Reflections of Tetrahedron:
There are six planes of reflection (one for each edge)
Rotations of Cube:
There are three axes of rotation for rotations by P /2 (one for each pair of faces)
There are four axes of rotation for rotations by 2 P /3 (one for each pair of opposite vertices)
There are six axes of rotation for rotations by rotations by P (one for each pair of opposite edges)
Reflections of Cube:
There are four planes of reflection that cut the cube into two identical rectangular prisms
There are six planes of reflection that cut the cube diagonally across two opposite faces
The cube also has point reflection symmetry about its center
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
For stuff we did last semester, see our class notes starting 10/17/2000 and handout for 10/19 and 10/20/2000.
Sources for new stuff:
Holden, Alan. Shapes, Space, and Symmetry. Dover Publications, Inc. (New York, 1971).
Lockwood, E.H. and R.H. MacMillan. Geometric Symmetry. Cambridge University Press (New York, 1978).
Rosen, Joe. Symmetry Discovered: Concepts and Applications in Nature and Science. Cambridge University Press (New York, 1975).
Weyl, Hermann. Symmetry. Princeton University Press (Princeton, 1952).
**********************************************************************